Clarke Griffin: The Useless Heroine | Analysis of The 100

"Read obsessively. Write furiously. Edit carefully," -Sissy Gavrilaki

Back in Seasons 1 and 2, I actually really liked Clarke Griffin. She was strong and sensitive and a great leader. However, she has been on a slow de-evolution since Season 3, although it has rapidly gone downhill since Season 4. I wasn't able to quite place why this happened and my subsequent disliking of her as a character. 

But it hit me in 4x11, "The Other Side".

Clarke's cold, stupid, and almost rash decisions are motivated by one thing: nothing. That's it. She's completely lost herself. In this whole battle to save the human race, she's become this archetype trying to save humanity, but also being a total asshole in the process. 

https://fsmedia.imgix.net/db/08/26/30/e42d/4b31/a240/a556ff3daa2f/clarke-griffin-in-a-lie-guarded.png

Clarke has lost her motivation. In Season 1, her motivation was to keep her people safe and to help them survive. In Season 2, it was to get them back home safely. In Season 3, it was pretty much Lexa for a while there, and then it was to save everyone from ALIE. In Season 4, it's become even more generic with 'saving humanity' plotline. But the wider Clarke's motivation gets, the less she feels like a real person, the less we connect with her and root for her. She is lacking a meaningful character arc or motivation, which is necessary for any character. It's like, Step 3 in creating a character.

Another problem is Clarke's lack of relationships. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Clarke needs a love interest or should just get with Bellamy already. While that would be nice, what I'm really talking about is how Clarke doesn't have any strong relationships we can root for, whether that be friendships, family members, or someone romantically. These relationships make a character more realistic, human, and make the audience want the main character to succeed. With people that the main character cares about, this raises the stakes. However, Clarke's friends or lovers are all dead, and the ones who aren't, their relationships have been severely neglected. 

Why do we love Bellamy, Octavia, Jasper, Monty, Murphy, and Raven so much?  Because they have people they love and who love them, and they fight for what they want and have clear and realistic character traits. They have interesting motivations that compel them to act and drive their storylines in dynamic and emotional ways. 

On the other hand, Clarke has become flat. Almost a Deus Ex Machina of sorts, where she always is the savior and always has to solve the problem. Without an interesting or emotional motivation, her actions seem, well, bitchy. Because Clarke never has emotional depth, change, or true struggle, she has become a gray slate, stagnant and uninteresting. 

And it's a real tragedy.

~

An amazing little post about the missed opportunity of great character conflict in 4x11:

http://wellamyblake.tumblr.com/post/160552229725/purging-2-disappointments-from-411 

~The WordShaker

It's More Fun If They Die at The End | Analysis of The 100's Season 4

"The worst thing you write is better than the best thing you did not write," -Ellen Jackson

PSA: Sorry there was no blog post last week. Life caught up with me, and I ended up having NO time. Hopefully that won't happen again. On to this week's post!

~

It's more fun if they die at the end. 

While this isn't always the case, in many post-apocalyptic or science fiction stories, it should be the case, especially when the situation is hopeless. 

Where shows and books write themselves into a corner, is that they set up this hopeless situation, creating this plotline that drives the story. However, what all too often happens is that the infamous plot device deus ex machina quite literally pops up. 

A deus ex machina is where a seemingly unsolvable problem is suddenly abruptly resolved by the inspired and unexpected intervention of a new event. Thanks, Wikipedia. 

The way that Season 4 of the 100 is progressing is that the radiation is exponentially growing, and will wipe out 99% of life on earth, as claimed by the show. The main plot involves them trying to find ways to either stop the radiation or protect everyone from it as it ravages the earth. Our favorite flawed leaders, Clarke and Bellamy, are trying to save the day, along with a neurotic Raven. 

In this past week's episode, there is almost a hope of having another bunker, built by a religious zealot. My initial thoughts during the episode consisted of "oh no, this place is going to be habitable, and then the rest of the season is just going to be them fixing it up and making it usable."

What the episode beautifully pulls off is convincing the audience that this place would be intact and able to support the earth's populous. When this doesn't end up working out for our fatal heroes, I felt almost a relief. 

Why?  Don't I want everything to work out peachy and for everyone to survive?

No, not in this case. Because if another deus ex machina comes in and saves everyone, then there will be no point, the cycle of surviving and killing that The 100 has found itself in will only perpetuate. 

My projection is that this season will be The 100's last. I almost want it to be it's last season, because it will create a beautiful story arc with my predictions. 

1a. Clarke and Bellamy are unable to find another place except the Ark to hold 100 people, almost poetically. 

1b. 100 people, hopefully not our main characters, hole up in the Ark and survive the nuclear meltdowns. Our main characters die happily, having fulfilled their mission and resolved the conflict, and the human race lives on. 

2a. The Ark is somehow damaged beyond the repair of fixing in time. There is no place to hide. 

2b. 99% of the human population dies. However, our characters accept their death and live their last, sick days to the fullest. Or, they put themselves out of their misery via group suicide. 

I want my beloved characters to die because it will wrap up the story. Truly, I see almost no way out of this situation. The only other avenue I could see is if Season 5 would cover the straggling survivors on the Ark. 

However, the ending of the series would be much more impactful if it ended here, and in the two scenarios I provided above. 

It would be more impactful because if everyone or our beloved characters died, then it would give the message that you can't just live life by surviving, and sometimes dying can be more fulfilling than living. If everyone died, it would be poetic justice. The Arkadians sent down the 100 to die, they didn't die, but later, they ended up dying from radiation fallout, having learned all they could on the ground. It would be a fulfilling and timely death for all of our original 100. 

Compare this to the movie Passengers, starring Christ Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence. They are faced with a spaceship that is breaking down, and they have woken up about eighty years too early to arrive at their destination. After fixing the ship, and, of course, realizing they love each other, they accept their fate, which is that they won't be able to reenter cryogenic sleep. So, Pratt's and Lawrence's characters 'bloom where they're planted' so to speak, and live out the rest of their lives, alone on the ship. This is the impactful, deep, and emotional ending I have envisioned for this series. 

I suppose I wouldn't be mad if Season 5 continued on with some of our main characters inside of the ark riding out the radiation, but then, that would definitely have to be the end, with the remaining survivors barely scraping by to rebuild civilization. However, Jasper, everyone's favorite drug addict alongside Charlie Pace, has been the ringleader of what I want to happen. 

The characters learn to live, not just to survive, accept their inevitable death, and find peace within themselves. 

A hesitant watcher because Jason Rothenberg has hurt me too much already,

~The WordShaker

The 100 | Why You Should Watch the TV Show and Not Read the Books

"Good writing is clear thinking made visible," -Bill Wheeler

So, if you're not up with the times, I am LOVING the CW's show, The 100. It takes the spot below my favorite show of all time, ABC's Lost. 

http://www.wallpapermade.com/images/wallpapers/originals/the-100-season-2-poster-wallpaper-4009.jpg

The 100 is amazing in it's depth. In it's characters. Just about everything in it is perfect and I enjoy every second of it. 

So, of course, when I heard it was a book, I felt obligated to read it. It just wouldn't feel right without reading the source material. 

Truthfully, I hadn't heard many good things about the book, and I didn't expect it to be better than the TV show, because, well, the TV show was phenomenal. 

And, oh boy, have I never been more right. 

So, these are the reasons why you should watch the TV show and NOT read the books. 

1. The Characters

Finn. Raven. Jasper. Monty. Lexa. Murphy. Lincoln. Abby and Kane and even Jaha. 

http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/thehundred/images/5/56/Finn-jasper-monty.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20140324012236

http://cdn-static.denofgeek.com/sites/denofgeek/files/styles/insert_main_wide_image/public/0/17//the_100_kane.jpg?itok=hOsqT_u0

All of the amazingly complex characters we fell in love with in the show are nowhere to be found in the books. The amazing cast of characters made the show all the more diverse and interesting. 

But what other characters do we get in place of them? 

Whiny, weak, and stupid Glass and her one dimentional boyfriend Luke and their fabricated drama. 

Not only that, but the book strips the characters of their dimentions. Funny enough, the TV or movie adaption normally does this, but in this case, the TV show builds upon and expands these bare-bones characters into beautiful people. 

For example, two amazing examples are Clarke and Octavia. Heroic and no-nonsense Clarke that clashes and yet somehow mixes with hothead Bellamy is replaced with a quiet damsel-in-distress. She nearly becomes an object of Wells' and Bellamy's attention, and the relationship between her and Thalia is pathetic. However, she still remains the most developed female character, which is saying something. 

 Octavia (or should I say Oct-slay-via) has beautiful character development over the first two seasons, and I must admit that I kind of hated her at first. She was whiny and stupid and promiscuous, but comes into her own via Lincoln, the absence of Bellamy, and her influence from the Grounders. Her fight for Lincoln is admirable and shows that she can be, and is, so much more. And besides, she kicks ass. However, Octavia and her character is pretty much gone. Nowhere to be found. Her only purpose is to further Bellamy's plot-line.

http://media.melty.com/article-5248-ajust_930/octavia-identifies-with-the-grounders-over.jpg

Surprisingly, TV Wells, who dies in the third episode of the first season, is more developed in that short period of time than through an entire book. In the show, he is unflinchingly moral and kind and loyal to a fault, and I was enraged when he died. But the Wells of the book has no other character, no other motivation than his selfish love of Clarke. 

http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/the100/images/c/c5/Wells_Jaha_Die_Landung.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160206114747&path-prefix=de

2. Depth 

Of which this book has none.

All of the amazing themes of the TV show, such as loyalty, good and evil being two sides of the same coin, moral ambiguity, and conflicting ideologies are nowhere to be found in the book.

http://cimg.tvgcdn.net/i/r/2015/12/14/45d81504-a65f-465b-9a3f-94ec5e76d663/resize/900x600/25cb4c2d06c35c4a64fd75aac194a466/the100-news.jpg

The author of this book seems to believe that luurrrrve is the only motivation teenagers can ever have. Other than Octavia stealing some medicine and some snide comments from Graham, Murphy's far inferior book counterpart, there's not much conflict outside of Glass's feeeeeeeeeeeelings, Wells trying to win back Clarke, and Clarke's flip-flopping feelings about Bellamy and Wells. 

There's just a great balance of coupley-love, platonic friendships, arguments, morality, action, and everything amazing about a show in The 100, while the book is jam packed full of shitty one lines about luurrrrve. 

Exhibit A: "To save the girl he loved, he'd have to endanger the entire human race."

Exhibit B: "There was no drug strong enough to repair a broken heart."

Exhibit C: "Without Luke, life would be as empty and cold as space itself."

Need I go on?

Good Lord, give me a break. There are character motivations other than the fleeting infatuation of teenage love. 

I can't even. 

3. Pacing 

This section will also talk about plot. 

So much more happens in Season 1 than even in the first book, and I feel that this is an issue of style. This book has four points-of-view, and this means the plot will move four times as slow because four different characters can be doing four different things in one day, which can take up a huge chunk of the book. This, in turn, causes lots of pages and words but little action. 

While I don't think this is detrimental, it's nowhere near as gripping as the TV show. There's just so much more going on in the show, versus the book. 

http://digitalhint.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/The-100-TV-Series-Pictures.jpg

Like I said, the show has a great mix of survival, action, and relationships, which I think is an important ratio to get right in shows like this. However, the book is like a terrible soap opera for teenagers. 

I would not recommend the books, even though I'm probably going to still read all of them. However, I highly encourage you to read them so we can bitch about them together. It's not the worst book I've ever read; it has some good aspects, but compared to the TV show, it's crap. 

~

I could probably talk forever about how the show is better than the book, but that might keep you from watching the amazing show. 


In other news, I SHIP BELLARKE SO FREAKING HARD I WILL GO DOWN WITH THIS SHIP SCREW CLEXA. 

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9U6hASYS2Z4/hqdefault.jpg

http://cdn.skim.gs/images/trzimrcgvqturpu6b9df/the-100-bellarke-kiss

Now all I have to do is wait for Season 3 to come out on Netflix. 

*sigh*

~The WordShaker